WDQMS STATUS - missing data

WDQMS STATUS - missing data

от Martina Suaya -
Количество ответов: 4

Good morning,

We have seen problems during de las 4 days with WDQMS showing data.

This map shows Mondays 3/10/202 availability of surface pressure for all centers


While same map from last Wensday 28/9/2022


You can appreciate on the first map the lack of greens in some countries (Chile, Brasil)) and the abundance of black and reds (Chile, Uruguay, Brasil). Data is not missing as far as we can see.

We see that some centers weren't providing statistics since friday (NCE´P) but others centers didn't show any missing statistics on data base (ECMWF). 

Maybe we just need to wait some days for things to acomodate. So far we see problems since friday 1/10/2022.

Regards

Martina

RWC Argentina

В ответ на Martina Suaya

Re: WDQMS STATUS - missing data

от Janette Calderón Suenzen - 

Good morning, indeed, since October 1 there was a loss of information as a result of the fact that on September 30
 in Chile we tried to resolve the issue of sending bulletins because stations are duplicated, in the end one was allowed to be sent and for that reason they appeared in black. 
 Just yesterday after 18 UTC it was restored. However, we still do not know how to solve the problem of sending bulletins, 
one corresponds to BUFR and another to WIS
Regards
Janette
Chile

В ответ на Martina Suaya

Re: WDQMS STATUS - missing data

от Cristina Prates -


Dear Martina,

Thank you very much for bringing this to my attention. In fact,  format issues with NCEP files over the weekend prevented them from being uploaded to the system. You are correct to assume that they will be incorporated into the combined view as soon as they are available (option "all"). You must view the combined map as a live map that displays the results according to the database status at the moment of viewing. However, I discovered that ECMWF is also responsible for what you noticed. Not just in South America, but worldwide, we saw a dramatic decline in the number of observations from SYNOPs (mostly BUFR). The numbers are back to normal now, but I'm not yet aware of the cause. 

Regards,

Cristina