Dear George,
Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
My name is KIMURA Satoshi from RWC Tokyo.
I do not have a full understanding of the situation yet, so could you please provide a little more information?
I was able to confirm the following stations in Cambodia using the NWP surface land observations Module on the WDQMS website:
・0-20000-0-48991 PHNOM-PENH (KHMOUGH)
・0-20000-0-48992 KOMPONG SPEU
・0-20000-0-48993 TAKEO
However, I was unable to identify the stations that you mentioned (TSI: 48991, 48992, 48993) on the WDQMS website.
I also searched for the above TSIs and place names in OSCAR/Surface, but could not confirm that Myanmar has registered those stations.
Based on your comments, the following possibilities come to mind. Could you please clarify the specific issue again? As a preliminary point, is the report you mentioned a SYNOP?
・Myanmar is reusing Cambodia’s TSI to report its own data
・Cambodia is distributing data containing incorrect header information
Best regards,
Satoshi
Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
My name is KIMURA Satoshi from RWC Tokyo.
I do not have a full understanding of the situation yet, so could you please provide a little more information?
I was able to confirm the following stations in Cambodia using the NWP surface land observations Module on the WDQMS website:
・0-20000-0-48991 PHNOM-PENH (KHMOUGH)
・0-20000-0-48992 KOMPONG SPEU
・0-20000-0-48993 TAKEO
However, I was unable to identify the stations that you mentioned (TSI: 48991, 48992, 48993) on the WDQMS website.
I also searched for the above TSIs and place names in OSCAR/Surface, but could not confirm that Myanmar has registered those stations.
Based on your comments, the following possibilities come to mind. Could you please clarify the specific issue again? As a preliminary point, is the report you mentioned a SYNOP?
・Myanmar is reusing Cambodia’s TSI to report its own data
・Cambodia is distributing data containing incorrect header information
Best regards,
Satoshi