Request for Feedback on Upper-Air Station Selection – Manual vs. Automated

Re: Request for Feedback on Upper-Air Station Selection – Manual vs. Automated

de Lebogang Neelo Makgati -
Número de respuestas: 0

Dear Peer Advisors

Cost Implications

The start-up costs for automated upper-air systems are expected to be high due to the need for international procurement, specialized training for remote operations, and ongoing maintenance. These considerations are significant for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDS), which often face financial and technological constraints in adopting and operating advanced systems.
Despite the high initial investment, automated systems can be advantageous in remote or unmanned locations, offering an all-in-one solution compared to the more segmented setup of manual systems.

Human Capacity

Manual upper-air systems present a more sustainable long-term approach, particularly due to their capacity to build and retain internal expertise. While automated systems may offer operational efficiencies, their higher maintenance and replacement costs could result in system abandonment over time. Additionally, trained human resources can conduct comprehensive environmental and risk assessments during upper-air ascents—capabilities that automated systems currently lack.

Site Security

Given the use of highly flammable gases in upper-air systems, operations are typically located in secure areas. This is a critical consideration regardless of whether the systems are manual or automated.

Operations and Maintenance

Automated systems, particularly those sourced internationally, present significant operational and maintenance challenges for LDCs and SIDS. These include high costs for spare parts, limited local technical support, and a lack of familiarity with system components. In contrast, most personnel in these regions already possess the skills to manage manual systems effectively, making them easier to operate and maintain.

Recommendations

  • Where there is sustainable funding mechanisms, adopt a hybrid approach where automated systems are deployed selectively in remote or unmanned sites, while manual systems continue to be used in locations with available human resources. Conduct site-specific risk assessments before choosing between manual and automated systems to ensure appropriate deployment based on local context and capacity/resource availability. 
Regards
Lebogang [on behalf of SAWS]